Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 207-215 (December 2009)


View previous. 6 of 9 View next.

To Autoregulate or Not to Autoregulate—That is No Longer the Question

Gorm Greisen, MD, DMScCorresponding Author Informationemail address

In the late 1970s, high cerebral blood flow was perceived as a cause of intracranial hemorrhage in the preterm infant. Intracranial hemorrhage was diagnosed by computed tomography and ultrasound found to be frequent not only in babies who died. Hemorrhage was soon linked to cerebral palsy in survivors. The analogy was hypertensive hemorrhagic stroke in the adult. Cerebral hemorrhage was perceived as the major (preventable) cause of brain injury in the preterm baby. An immature cerebral autoregulation or a vulnerability of the autoregulation exposed by preceding hypoxia or ischemia therefore became a focus of neonatal brain research in the 1980s. Over the years the focus has changed, first to the pathogenesis of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, then to the effects of pCO2, and now 30 years later to a more comprehensive, less clearly hypothesis-driven exploration of the multitude of factors involved in cerebral blood flow and oxygenation. Meanwhile, some basic questions regarding autoregulation remain unanswered, and some concepts from the 1970s still direct clinical practice.

Department of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Gorm Greisen, MD, DMSc, Department of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet 5024, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark

PII: S1071-9091(09)00059-X

doi:10.1016/j.spen.2009.09.002


View previous. 6 of 9 View next.

Advertisement